Buddhism's Relevance for
Today: Mindfulness
In
1979, after a flash of insight on a meditation retreat, John
Kabat-Zinn started the Stress Reduction Clinic at the University of
Massachusetts Medical Center (“Indra's Net,” 226). This clinic
has provided help for over ten thousand medical patients suffering
from ailments as varied as “heart disease, cancer, HIV, AIDS,
chronic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, high blood pressure, skin
problems, chronic anxiety, [and] chronic panic disorder,” teaching
them all 'Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction' (MBSR) (230). Clearly,
mindfulness is not intended to cure all of those ailments, rather the
program is “designed to teach people how to take better care of
themselves and how to live more skilfully and more fully as a
complement to whatever their medical treatments are” (235). As in
Buddhism, the point is not to avoid or stop pain, which is an
inevitable part of life, but rather to change our relationship to our
pain. The influence of this approach to meditation as 'mindfulness'
has grown widely in the subsequent years, being integrated into other
forms of therapy such as Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
and Dialectical-Behavioral Therapy (DBT), used not just for general
improvement of patients' skillful living, but to treat a wide range
of specific mental disorders including anxiety disorders and
depression (Didonna 10-11). In these applications, we see that
mindfulness becomes an integral part of ending certain kinds of
suffering that Western medicine has characterized as diseases.
As
formulated by Kabat-Zinn, mindfulness is “a particular way of
paying attention, one that gives rise to a moment-to-moment,
non-judging awareness” (“Indra's Net,” 230). Although
Kabat-Zinn takes this definition to cover meditation as taught by the
Buddha in the Mahasattipathana Sutta (233),
Georges Dreyfus has criticized this definition as not accurately
representing the Pali term sati
(44-45). Dreyfus argues that mindfulness is not properly limited to
the present moment, being instead intimately tied to memory, and
furthermore that it contains a judging element in order to
distinguish the wholesome states one wishes to encourage from
unwholesome states one hopes to diminish (45). Dreyfus stresses the
definition of mindfulness as keeping in mind a particular object, and
argues that this skill is merely a means to the end of developing the
concentration that will lead one to insight and “mature judgments”
(51-53). On the one hand, Kabat-Zinn does make a distinction between
what he would call 'judgment' and what he would call 'discrimination'
(“Indra's Net,” 230), which I think answers Dreyfus' point about
recognizing wholesome versus unwholesome states. On the other hand,
as Dreyfus acknowledges (42), Kabat-Zinn is more interested in an
'operational' definition of mindfulness as used in a clinical
setting, and is quite happy to use the term in a way that “gloss[es]
over important elements of Buddhist psychology” that can “be
differentiated and clarified later” (Foreward, xxix). Kabat-Zinn
cites work on a “collective articulation/definition of mindfulness”
reported by Margaret Cullen to the effect that:
Many contemporary Buddhist teachers
use the term mindfulness in a more comprehensive way than simply
“remembering” or lacking confusion. . . . the components of
mindfulness as it is more broadly construed might include not only
sati, but also
sampajanna (meaning
clear comprehension) and appamada,
(meaning heedfulness). . . . as both Buddhist and secular mindfulness
programs proliferate in the west, this broader use of mindfulness has
become a culturally meaningful and accessible “umbrella” term for
the vast majority of practitioners unversed in the intricacies of
translating Sanskrit or Pali (qtd. in Foreward, xxx).
Let us then put aside any controversy over the historical accuracy of
the term and take a brief look at what this understanding of
mindfulness provides for patients and practitioners.
This
conception of mindfulness is used in many contexts, but here we will
just take one example to examine. Mark Williams, John Teasdale, and
Zindel Segal have written for practitioners on using MBCT to treat
depression (2002) and along with Kabat-Zinn have presented the same
topic for a mass audience as well (2007). In the latter work, they
take up Kabat-Zinn's definition of mindfulness as “the awareness
that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present
moment, and non-judgmentally to things as they are” (47). Without
mentioning the Pali terms or even discussing them in an explicitly
Buddhist frame of reference, they show how this practice can lead
towards an understanding of both anicca
(impermanence) and anitta
(not-self) in order to combat specific forms of dukkha
(suffering) (46,165,99). The authors focus on the feedback between our experience, our interpretations of
that experience, our habit of taking those interpretations as facts,
and how all of this is reflected in and affected by the body (11-49).
The main power of mindfulness in this model is that, as one learns
to pay better attention to one's own experience at all levels, one
can affect the chain of dependent arising so as to alter its outcome.
Or, in the authors' words:
The machinery that sets the cycle of unhappiness in motion may
operate so smoothly that we don't even detect its workings, but that
does not mean that it is an unstoppable juggernaut. Every link that
keeps the machine going – body-thoughts, thoughts-feelings,
feelings-body, and so forth – is an opportunity to redirect the
sequence. The cycle can be broken simply by bringing mindful
awareness to its links and, in particular, to the body (99).
By training their readers in the practice of mindfulness (and
encouraging them to participate in courses on MBCT) as a means of
seeing these connections and recognizing that the thoughts and
feelings involved are 'not us' and that any negativity will
inevitably change on its own, the authors present many of the central
insights of Buddhism in a language appropriate for contemporary
Americans who may not be tempted by what they would otherwise see as
'foreign' or 'religious' ideas. In this way the Dhamma of the Buddha
is made approachable and accessible to many who would otherwise not
be likely to benefit from it.
Works Cited
Cullen, Margaret. “Mindfulness: A Working Definition.” Emotional
Awareness: Overcoming the Obsatacles to Psychological Balance and
Compassion. The Dalai Lama and Paul Ekman. New York: Henry Holt,
2008. 61–63.
Didonna, Fabrizio. Introduction. Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness.
Ed. Fabrizio Didonna. New York: Springer, 2009. 1-14.
Dreyfus, Georges. “Is Mindfulness Present-Centered and
Non-Judgmental? A Discussion of the Cognitive Dimensions of
Mindfulness.” Contemporary Buddhism 12.1 (2011): 41-54.
Kabat-Zinn, John. Forward. Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness.
Ed. Fabrizio Didonna. New York: Springer, 2009. xxv-xxxiii.
Kabat-Zinn, John. “Indra's Net at Work: The Mainstreaming of Dharma
Practice in Society.” The Psychology of Awakening. Eds. Gay
Watson, Stephen Batchelor, and Guy Claxton. York Beach, Maine:
Samual Weiser, Inc., 2000. 225-249.
Willams, Mark, John Teasdale, and Zindel Sega. Mindfulness-Based
Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing
Relapse. New York: The Guilford
Press, 2002.
Willams, Mark, John Teasdale, Zindel Segal, and Jon Kabat-Zinn. The
Mindful Way through Depression: Freeing Yourself from
ChronicUnhappiness. New York:
The Guilford Press, 2007.
Note: In-text citations and the “Works Cited” section are
presented in the format of the following source:
Modern Language Association. MLA
Handbook for Writers of Research Papers.
7th
ed. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2009.
Just saw that there's a book, Mindfulness For Dummies, by Shamash Alidina
ReplyDeletehttp://books.google.com/books?id=phKget5ScdMC
Your post is a good web cite.
ReplyDelete